Herring River Restoration Project

Alternatives to tidal restoration were not considered

There is no evidence that those who first became concerned about the pollution of the Herring River explored any alternatives (such as dredging,) before settling on tidal restoration as the preferred solution. The timeline prepared by the Cape Cod National Seashore first identified water quality problems in the river in 1980. But the push to restore the salt marsh by increasing tidal flow began many years earlier.

In a 2003 briefing paper, John Portnoy reported:
The Herring River Restoration Project's Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR 2016) contains 52 pages (Chapter 2) discussing alternatives. But all of them fall within the framework of tidal restoration. For example: So, it appears that, although poor water quality has been a major driving force during the first two decades of the 21st century, the decision had been made to increase tidal flow to restore the Herring River salt marsh several decades earlier.


Return to Editorial
Return to Salinization
Top of page